CryptPadvsnocodb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CryptPad | nocodb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Office Suites | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 8 030 | 65 374 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +78 | +320 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 15 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 71/100 for CryptPad, so it is the safer default.
nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for CryptPad.
If you want the quickest setup, nocodb is easier to run; CryptPad needs more configuration.
nocodb is growing faster right now (+320 stars in 30 days).
CryptPad details →nocodb details →
Swap a project
Keep CryptPad, compare it with
Keep nocodb, compare it with