crowdsecvsZed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Two self-hosted Security projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| crowdsec | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 78 in Security | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 15 357 | 16 059 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +410 | +244 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 31 |
| Latest release | v1.8.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scores 80/100 against 76/100 for crowdsec, so it is the safer default.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for crowdsec.
If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; crowdsec needs more configuration.
crowdsec details →Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) details →All Security projects →
Swap a project
Keep crowdsec, compare it with
Keep Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), compare it with