crowdsecvsWildbox
Two self-hosted Security projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| crowdsec | Wildbox | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 78 in Security | #56 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 15 362 | 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +415 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.8.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.12.2 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
crowdsec scores 76/100 against 44/100 for Wildbox, so it is the safer default.
Wildbox ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for crowdsec.
If you want the quickest setup, crowdsec is easier to run; Wildbox needs more configuration.
crowdsec is growing faster right now (+415 stars in 30 days).
crowdsec details →Wildbox details →All Security projects →
Swap a project
Keep crowdsec, compare it with
Keep Wildbox, compare it with