crowdsecvsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| crowdsec | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 78 in Security | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 15 360 | 95 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +413 | +2 347 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 25 |
| Latest release | v1.8.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 76/100 for crowdsec, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for crowdsec.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 347 stars in 30 days).
crowdsec details →Stirling-PDF details →
Swap a project
Keep crowdsec, compare it with
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with