Crawl4AIvstxtdot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Crawl4AI | txtdot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 16 in Web Scraping | #19 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 86 506 | 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 286 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.9.5 · 14 Oct 2026 | v1.10.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Crawl4AI scores 86/100 against 47/100 for txtdot, so it is the safer default.
Crawl4AI ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for txtdot.
If you want the quickest setup, txtdot is easier to run; Crawl4AI needs more configuration.
Crawl4AI is growing faster right now (+2 286 stars in 30 days).
Crawl4AI details →txtdot details →
Swap a project
Keep Crawl4AI, compare it with
Keep txtdot, compare it with