CoturnvsZero-K
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Coturn | Zero-K | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 14 526 | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +99 | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Lua |
Which one should you pick?
Coturn scores 71/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.
Coturn ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.
If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; Coturn needs more configuration.
Coturn is growing faster right now (+99 stars in 30 days).
Coturn details →Zero-K details →
Swap a project
Keep Coturn, compare it with
Keep Zero-K, compare it with