Janus WebRTC ServervsZero-K
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Janus WebRTC Server | Zero-K | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 9 197 | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +28 | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Lua |
Which one should you pick?
Janus WebRTC Server scores 71/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; Janus WebRTC Server needs more configuration.
Janus WebRTC Server details →Zero-K details →
Swap a project
Keep Janus WebRTC Server, compare it with
Keep Zero-K, compare it with