CoturnvsVert
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Coturn | Vert | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #2 of 10 in File Conversion |
| GitHub stars | 14 529 | 16 176 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +99 | +543 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Coturn and Vert score the same (71/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Coturn ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Vert.
If you want the quickest setup, Vert is easier to run; Coturn needs more configuration.
Vert is growing faster right now (+543 stars in 30 days).
Coturn details →Vert details →
Swap a project
Keep Coturn, compare it with
Keep Vert, compare it with