CoturnvsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Coturn | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 529 | 95 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +99 | +2 347 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 25 |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 71/100 for Coturn, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Coturn.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 347 stars in 30 days).
Coturn details →Stirling-PDF details →
Swap a project
Keep Coturn, compare it with
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with