CoturnvsKokoro FastAPI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Coturn | Kokoro FastAPI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 14 529 | 5 612 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +99 | +135 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 14 |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Coturn scores 71/100 against 69/100 for Kokoro FastAPI, so it is the safer default.
Coturn ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Kokoro FastAPI.
If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; Coturn needs more configuration.
Coturn details →Kokoro FastAPI details →
Swap a project
Keep Coturn, compare it with
Keep Kokoro FastAPI, compare it with