CoturnvsFreeSBC
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Coturn | FreeSBC | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #14 of 16 in VoIP |
| GitHub stars | 14 526 | 270 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +99 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 10 |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v0.6.3 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Coturn scores 71/100 against 48/100 for FreeSBC, so it is the safer default.
Coturn ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for FreeSBC.
If you want the quickest setup, Coturn is easier to run; FreeSBC needs more configuration.
Coturn is growing faster right now (+99 stars in 30 days).
Coturn details →FreeSBC details →
Swap a project
Keep Coturn, compare it with
Keep FreeSBC, compare it with