Cotalvslangflow
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Cotal | langflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 90/100 |
| Rank in category | #97 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 366 | 156 115 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +924 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 31 | 20 |
| Latest release | v0.121.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 50/100 for Cotal, so it is the safer default.
Cotal ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for langflow.
langflow is growing faster right now (+924 stars in 30 days).
Cotal details →langflow details →All AI Agents projects →
Swap a project
Keep Cotal, compare it with
Keep langflow, compare it with