corednsvstesserae
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| coredns | tesserae | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #14 of 44 in Dashboard |
| GitHub stars | 14 398 | 984 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +55 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 78 |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.480.0 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
coredns scores 76/100 against 51/100 for tesserae, so it is the safer default.
tesserae ships more often: 78 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for coredns.
coredns is growing faster right now (+55 stars in 30 days).
coredns details →tesserae details →
Swap a project
Keep coredns, compare it with
Keep tesserae, compare it with