corednsvsOpenWA
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| coredns | OpenWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #2 of 19 in API Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 400 | 16 334 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +60 | +328 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.26.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWA scores 77/100 against 76/100 for coredns, so it is the safer default.
coredns ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for OpenWA.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenWA is easier to run; coredns needs more configuration.
OpenWA is growing faster right now (+328 stars in 30 days).
coredns details →OpenWA details →
Swap a project
Keep coredns, compare it with
Keep OpenWA, compare it with