OpenWAvsPi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenWA | Pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in API Management | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 16 334 | 61 531 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +328 | +487 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 7 |
| Latest release | v0.26.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 77/100 for OpenWA, so it is the safer default.
Pi-hole ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for OpenWA.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenWA is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.
OpenWA details →Pi-hole details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenWA, compare it with
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with