corednsvsK16S
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| coredns | K16S | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #22 of 30 in Education |
| GitHub stars | 14 399 | 226 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +56 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
coredns scores 76/100 against 43/100 for K16S, so it is the safer default.
coredns ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for K16S.
If you want the quickest setup, coredns is easier to run; K16S needs more configuration.
coredns is growing faster right now (+56 stars in 30 days).
coredns details →K16S details →
Swap a project
Keep coredns, compare it with
Keep K16S, compare it with