corednsvsHiClaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| coredns | HiClaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #32 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 14 400 | 5 885 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +60 | +222 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
coredns scores 76/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for coredns.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; coredns needs more configuration.
HiClaw is growing faster right now (+222 stars in 30 days).
coredns details →HiClaw details →
Swap a project
Keep coredns, compare it with
Keep HiClaw, compare it with