AdGuard HomevsHiClaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AdGuard Home | HiClaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 41 in DNS | #32 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 37 803 | 5 885 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +759 | +222 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.0.0-b.1 · 30 Sept 2026 | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
AdGuard Home scores 84/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
AdGuard Home ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for HiClaw.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; AdGuard Home needs more configuration.
AdGuard Home is growing faster right now (+759 stars in 30 days).
AdGuard Home details →HiClaw details →
Swap a project
Keep AdGuard Home, compare it with
Keep HiClaw, compare it with