copypartyvsWhiteboard
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | Whiteboard | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #5 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 47 185 | 3 381 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +402 | +4 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | diffr/0.1.22 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 56/100 for Whiteboard, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Whiteboard.
If you want the quickest setup, Whiteboard is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+402 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →Whiteboard details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep Whiteboard, compare it with