copypartyvsWebCodex
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | WebCodex | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #60 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 47 168 | 2 447 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +395 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v0.4.6 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 55/100 for WebCodex, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for WebCodex.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+395 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →WebCodex details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep WebCodex, compare it with