copypartyvsWazuh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | Wazuh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 47 163 | 17 476 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +390 | +491 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v4.14.9 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 80/100 for Wazuh, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Wazuh.
If you want the quickest setup, copyparty is easier to run; Wazuh needs more configuration.
copyparty details →Wazuh details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep Wazuh, compare it with