copypartyvsTurtl
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | Turtl | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #47 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 47 188 | 631 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +405 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 47/100 for Turtl, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Turtl.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+405 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →Turtl details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep Turtl, compare it with