copypartyvsThoughtDAG
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | ThoughtDAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #25 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 47 184 | 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +401 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v0.5.26 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 51/100 for ThoughtDAG, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for ThoughtDAG.
If you want the quickest setup, ThoughtDAG is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+401 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →ThoughtDAG details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep ThoughtDAG, compare it with