copypartyvsquackback
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | quackback | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #9 of 14 in Customer Support |
| GitHub stars | 47 175 | 331 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +392 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v0.14.1 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 50/100 for quackback, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for quackback.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+392 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →quackback details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep quackback, compare it with