copypartyvsOrca
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | Orca | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 91/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #1 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 47 159 | 108 739 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +386 | +8 832 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 82/100 for copyparty, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Orca.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+8 832 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →Orca details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep Orca, compare it with