copypartyvsopenvpn_webpanel_manager
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | openvpn_webpanel_manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #50 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 47 186 | 297 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +403 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | 4.0.1 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 39/100 for openvpn_webpanel_manager, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for openvpn_webpanel_manager.
If you want the quickest setup, copyparty is easier to run; openvpn_webpanel_manager needs more configuration.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+403 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →openvpn_webpanel_manager details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep openvpn_webpanel_manager, compare it with