copypartyvsopenvox
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | openvox | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #5 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 181 | 199 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +398 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 17 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | 8.31.2 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 53/100 for openvox, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for openvox.
If you want the quickest setup, copyparty is easier to run; openvox needs more configuration.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+398 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →openvox details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep openvox, compare it with