copypartyvsnetxms
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | netxms | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #19 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 47 175 | 417 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +392 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | release-6.2.4 · 2 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 55/100 for netxms, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for netxms.
If you want the quickest setup, copyparty is easier to run; netxms needs more configuration.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+392 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →netxms details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep netxms, compare it with