copypartyvsLubeLogger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | LubeLogger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 163 | 2 924 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +390 | +68 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 17 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for LubeLogger.
If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+390 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →LubeLogger details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep LubeLogger, compare it with