copypartyvsIPFS Web UI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | IPFS Web UI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #12 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 47 169 | 1 636 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +396 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v4.13.0 · 18 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 60/100 for IPFS Web UI, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for IPFS Web UI.
If you want the quickest setup, IPFS Web UI is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+396 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →IPFS Web UI details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep IPFS Web UI, compare it with