coolifyvsWhirl
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| coolify | Whirl | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #23 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 65 231 | 510 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 986 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 45 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.5.3 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
coolify scores 89/100 against 52/100 for Whirl, so it is the safer default.
coolify ships more often: 45 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Whirl.
If you want the quickest setup, coolify is easier to run; Whirl needs more configuration.
coolify is growing faster right now (+2 986 stars in 30 days).
coolify details →Whirl details →