CookCLIvsWPS Office
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CookCLI | WPS Office | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #6 of 6 in Office Suites |
| GitHub stars | 1 423 | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 21 |
| Latest release | v0.39.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | 11.1.0.11723-2-ls194 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Dockerfile |
Which one should you pick?
CookCLI scores 61/100 against 52/100 for WPS Office, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, CookCLI is easier to run; WPS Office needs more configuration.
CookCLI is growing faster right now (+33 stars in 30 days).
CookCLI details →WPS Office details →
Swap a project
Keep CookCLI, compare it with
Keep WPS Office, compare it with