CookCLIvsWPMgr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CookCLI | WPMgr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #15 of 18 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 423 | 165 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.39.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | v0.61.198 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Go |
Which one should you pick?
CookCLI scores 61/100 against 48/100 for WPMgr, so it is the safer default.
CookCLI ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for WPMgr.
If you want the quickest setup, CookCLI is easier to run; WPMgr needs more configuration.
CookCLI is growing faster right now (+33 stars in 30 days).
CookCLI details →WPMgr details →
Swap a project
Keep CookCLI, compare it with
Keep WPMgr, compare it with