CookCLIvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CookCLI | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 1 423 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.39.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit scores 63/100 against 61/100 for CookCLI, so it is the safer default.
CookCLI ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
If you want the quickest setup, CookCLI is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
CookCLI is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).
CookCLI details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep CookCLI, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with