CookCLIvsUmbraco CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CookCLI | Umbraco CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #7 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 423 | 5 278 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 27 |
| Latest release | v0.39.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | C |
Which one should you pick?
Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 61/100 for CookCLI, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for CookCLI.
If you want the quickest setup, CookCLI is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
CookCLI details →Umbraco CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep CookCLI, compare it with
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with