CookCLIvsApache Tika
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CookCLI | Apache Tika | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction |
| GitHub stars | 1 423 | 4 114 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.39.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Tika scores 68/100 against 61/100 for CookCLI, so it is the safer default.
CookCLI ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Tika.
If you want the quickest setup, CookCLI is easier to run; Apache Tika needs more configuration.
CookCLI is growing faster right now (+33 stars in 30 days).
CookCLI details →Apache Tika details →
Swap a project
Keep CookCLI, compare it with
Keep Apache Tika, compare it with