CookCLIvsSpacetimeDB
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CookCLI | SpacetimeDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #7 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 1 424 | 25 416 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 | +94 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 7 |
| Latest release | v0.39.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | v2.13.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
SpacetimeDB scores 75/100 against 61/100 for CookCLI, so it is the safer default.
CookCLI ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for SpacetimeDB.
If you want the quickest setup, CookCLI is easier to run; SpacetimeDB needs more configuration.
SpacetimeDB is growing faster right now (+94 stars in 30 days).
CookCLI details →SpacetimeDB details →
Swap a project
Keep CookCLI, compare it with
Keep SpacetimeDB, compare it with