CookCLIvsryot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CookCLI | ryot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 1 422 | 3 650 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +44 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.39.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ryot scores 64/100 against 61/100 for CookCLI, so it is the safer default.
CookCLI ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.
If you want the quickest setup, CookCLI is easier to run; ryot needs more configuration.
CookCLI details →ryot details →
Swap a project
Keep CookCLI, compare it with
Keep ryot, compare it with