CookCLIvsQinglong
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CookCLI | Qinglong | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #3 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 423 | 20 025 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.39.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | upgrade-master · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Qinglong scores 69/100 against 61/100 for CookCLI, so it is the safer default.
CookCLI ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Qinglong.
CookCLI is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).
CookCLI details →Qinglong details →
Swap a project
Keep CookCLI, compare it with
Keep Qinglong, compare it with