CookCLIvsNightscout
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CookCLI | Nightscout | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #2 of 31 in Health & Fitness |
| GitHub stars | 1 422 | 2 852 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +23 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.39.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | v15.0.9 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Nightscout scores 67/100 against 61/100 for CookCLI, so it is the safer default.
CookCLI ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Nightscout.
If you want the quickest setup, CookCLI is easier to run; Nightscout needs more configuration.
CookCLI details →Nightscout details →
Swap a project
Keep CookCLI, compare it with
Keep Nightscout, compare it with