consulvsZigbee2MQTT
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| consul | Zigbee2MQTT | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #5 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 30 090 | 15 762 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 15 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | 2.14.2 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Zigbee2MQTT scores 76/100 against 73/100 for consul, so it is the safer default.
Zigbee2MQTT ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for consul.
If you want the quickest setup, Zigbee2MQTT is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.
Zigbee2MQTT is growing faster right now (+98 stars in 30 days).
consul details →Zigbee2MQTT details →