consulvsxpipe-webtop
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| consul | xpipe-webtop | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #5 of 23 in Remote Access |
| GitHub stars | 30 090 | 14 634 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 | +76 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 35 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | 24.9 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
consul scores 73/100 against 70/100 for xpipe-webtop, so it is the safer default.
xpipe-webtop ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for consul.
If you want the quickest setup, xpipe-webtop is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.
xpipe-webtop is growing faster right now (+76 stars in 30 days).
consul details →xpipe-webtop details →