consulvsWebCodex
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| consul | WebCodex | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #60 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 30 089 | 2 448 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 7 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v0.4.6 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
consul scores 73/100 against 55/100 for WebCodex, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, WebCodex is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.
consul is growing faster right now (+8 stars in 30 days).
consul details →WebCodex details →