consulvsSyncWatch同步观影
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| consul | SyncWatch同步观影 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 30 089 | 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
consul scores 73/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.
SyncWatch同步观影 ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for consul.
If you want the quickest setup, SyncWatch同步观影 is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.
consul is growing faster right now (+8 stars in 30 days).
consul details →SyncWatch同步观影 details →