consulvsquackback
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| consul | quackback | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #9 of 14 in Customer Support |
| GitHub stars | 30 091 | 331 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 15 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v0.14.1 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
consul scores 73/100 against 50/100 for quackback, so it is the safer default.
quackback ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for consul.
If you want the quickest setup, quackback is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.
consul is growing faster right now (+10 stars in 30 days).
consul details →quackback details →