consulvsPulse
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| consul | Pulse | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 30 089 | 6 973 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +232 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 43 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
consul scores 73/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.
Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for consul.
If you want the quickest setup, Pulse is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.
Pulse is growing faster right now (+232 stars in 30 days).
consul details →Pulse details →