consulvsPairDrop
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| consul | PairDrop | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #2 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 30 089 | 11 711 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +252 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
PairDrop scores 75/100 against 73/100 for consul, so it is the safer default.
consul ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for PairDrop.
If you want the quickest setup, PairDrop is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.
PairDrop is growing faster right now (+252 stars in 30 days).
consul details →PairDrop details →