consulvsopen·kritt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| consul | open·kritt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #24 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 30 091 | 2 380 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v1.4.1 · 16 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
consul scores 73/100 against 62/100 for open·kritt, so it is the safer default.
consul ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for open·kritt.
If you want the quickest setup, open·kritt is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.
consul is growing faster right now (+10 stars in 30 days).
consul details →open·kritt details →