consulvsmkcertWeb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| consul | mkcertWeb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #6 of 8 in Certificate Management |
| GitHub stars | 30 090 | 221 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 13 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v4.4.2 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
consul scores 73/100 against 48/100 for mkcertWeb, so it is the safer default.
mkcertWeb ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for consul.
If you want the quickest setup, mkcertWeb is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.
consul is growing faster right now (+9 stars in 30 days).
consul details →mkcertWeb details →