CompreFacevsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CompreFace | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #19 of 125 in AI | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 8 388 | 8 652 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +56 | +153 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
CompreFace scores 69/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
Workout.cool ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for CompreFace.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; CompreFace needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+153 stars in 30 days).
CompreFace details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep CompreFace, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with